Re: [Freedreno] [pull] drm/msm: msm-next for 4.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So this isn't how I planned on announcing it, but hey, I'm back.

> Rob Clark (5):
>       drm/msm: extend the submit ioctl to pass in flags

Renaming 'pipe' to 'flags' would break backwards compatibility - I'm not big
fan of 'pipe' either but I would strongly recommend keeping it just to keep
everybody happy. I know that you bump the API version a couple of changes
later and we could use that as a stop gap but workarounds suck.

>       drm/msm: submit support for in-fences
>       drm/msm: move fence allocation out of msm_gpu_submit()
>       drm/msm: submit support for out-fences
>       drm/msm: bump kernel api version for explicit fencing

You misspelled ioctl in the comment. :)

Regards,
Jordan

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux