On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:28:46PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 3/19/25 6:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> On 3/18/25 10:30 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 07:35:15PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> SC7180 comes in a couple firmware flavors, some of which don't support > >>>> PSCI in OSI mode. That prevents the power domain exepcted by the RSC > >>>> node from providing useful information on system power collapse. > >>> > >>> Is this behaviour specific to SC7180 or only to ChromeBooks? For example > >>> TCL Book 14 Go or ECS Liva QC710, would they also use this compat? > >> > >> The hardware and firmware representation of the RSC is identical, but > >> I wanted to alter the bindings required properties based on the specific > >> possibly-chrome platforms. > > > > Should we instead have a separate compatible (?) for ChromeOS platforms > > only? > > No, the RSC is exactly the same. Quite frankly, the expected power-domains > entry is just a way that's convenient to Linux to signal the platform going > off between the drivers > > I don't think there is much to overthink here. Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- With best wishes Dmitry
