On 3/19/25 6:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3/18/25 10:30 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 07:35:15PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> SC7180 comes in a couple firmware flavors, some of which don't support >>>> PSCI in OSI mode. That prevents the power domain exepcted by the RSC >>>> node from providing useful information on system power collapse. >>> >>> Is this behaviour specific to SC7180 or only to ChromeBooks? For example >>> TCL Book 14 Go or ECS Liva QC710, would they also use this compat? >> >> The hardware and firmware representation of the RSC is identical, but >> I wanted to alter the bindings required properties based on the specific >> possibly-chrome platforms. > > Should we instead have a separate compatible (?) for ChromeOS platforms > only? No, the RSC is exactly the same. Quite frankly, the expected power-domains entry is just a way that's convenient to Linux to signal the platform going off between the drivers I don't think there is much to overthink here. Konrad
