On 25.02.2025 10:12, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 2/25/25 3:01 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:04:47 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>> +struct device_node *phy_package_shared_get_node(struct phy_device *phydev); >>> +void *phy_package_shared_get_priv(struct phy_device *phydev); >> >> A bit sad that none of the users can fit in a line with this naming. >> Isn't "shared" implied by "package" here ? >> How would you feel about phy_package_get_priv() ? > > FWIW I personally agree the latter would be a better name. > > @Heiner: could you please give that naming schema a shot here? > > /P > Sure. I'll submit a v2 with the suggested changes.
