On 2/25/25 3:01 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 22:04:47 +0100 Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> +struct device_node *phy_package_shared_get_node(struct phy_device *phydev); >> +void *phy_package_shared_get_priv(struct phy_device *phydev); > > A bit sad that none of the users can fit in a line with this naming. > Isn't "shared" implied by "package" here ? > How would you feel about phy_package_get_priv() ? FWIW I personally agree the latter would be a better name. @Heiner: could you please give that naming schema a shot here? /P
