On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 09:06:19PM +0300, Danila Tikhonov wrote: > On 2/9/25 01:09, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > On 2025-02-03 21:14:26, Danila Tikhonov wrote: > > > From: Eugene Lepshy <fekz115@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > DRM DSC helper has parameters for various bpc values other than 8: > > Weird zero-width \u200b spaces here between "values" and "other", please delete > > those. > Thanks, I will fix it in the next version. > > > (8/10/12/14/16). > > > > > > Remove this guard. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugene Lepshy <fekz115@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Danila Tikhonov <danila@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Should this patch elaborate that those "DRM DSC helper" don't have any > > additional guarding for the values you mention either, i.e. passing 9 or 11 or > > > 16 don't seem to be checked anywhere else either? > There are no other bpc checks, you are right. But to be honest I don't > really see any sense in this. Anyway, if you still want us to leave the > current guard and just extend it with new values (for example via > switch case) - let me know. Yes, please. Add a caselist and also a note that only 8, 10 and 12 are valid for DSC 1.1 block. Then whoever stomps upon other bpc value will have to extend the check, verifying DSC version. > > And your title might have space to spell out "Bits Per Component" entirely. > I'll fix that too. > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 7 +------ > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c > > > index 007311c21fda..d182af7bbb81 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c > > > @@ -1767,11 +1767,6 @@ static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, struct drm_dsc > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > - if (dsc->bits_per_component != 8) { > > > - DRM_DEV_ERROR(&msm_host->pdev->dev, "DSI does not support bits_per_component != 8 yet\n"); > > > - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > - } > > > - > > > dsc->simple_422 = 0; > > > dsc->convert_rgb = 1; > > > dsc->vbr_enable = 0; > > This seems supicous on the dpu1 side, in the original DSC 1.1 (not 1.2) block in > > dpu_hw_dsc_config(), which has: > > > > data |= (dsc->line_buf_depth << 3); > > data |= (dsc->simple_422 << 2); > > data |= (dsc->convert_rgb << 1); > > data |= dsc->bits_per_component; > > > > The original value of `8` would overlap with the lowest bit of line_buf_depth > > (4th bit in `data`). Now, the 2nd bit which will take the value from > > convert_rgb, which is already set to 1 above, will overlap with the 2nd bit in > > your new bpc value of 10. > > > > Can you double-check that this code in DPU1 is actually valid? I assume you > > have tested this panel at least and it is working (worthy mention in the cover > > letter?), this just seems like yet another mistake in the original bindings > > (though the register always had a matching value with downstream on 8 BPC panels > > for me). > > Of course I have tested the panel and it works, I just thought it would > be obvious. We also have tested sm7150-xiaomi-courbet, sm8450-xiaomi-cupid > and sm8475-nothing-pong, which already have bpp = bpc = 10 panels and > with some hack it also work without any changes to the DRM. This is now being fixed by a separate patch. > > > > @@ -1779,7 +1774,7 @@ static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, struct drm_dsc > > > drm_dsc_set_const_params(dsc); > > > drm_dsc_set_rc_buf_thresh(dsc); > > > - /* handle only bpp = bpc = 8, pre-SCR panels */ > > > + /* handle only pre-SCR panels */ > > > ret = drm_dsc_setup_rc_params(dsc, DRM_DSC_1_1_PRE_SCR); > > Good catch - this comment sounds like it's documenting a limitation of > > this helper function, but the function does not have such limitations... > > rc_parameters_pre_scr has values for all these combinations. > Maybe we should remove this comment entirely? No, the pre-SCR comment is fine. > > Regards, > Danila > > - Marijn > > > > > if (ret) { > > > DRM_DEV_ERROR(&msm_host->pdev->dev, "could not find DSC RC parameters\n"); > > > -- > > > 2.48.1 > > > -- With best wishes Dmitry