Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: add kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo to apq8016 flakes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Helen / Vignesh

On 12/4/2024 12:33 PM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote:




---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 16:21:26 -0300 Abhinav Kumar  wrote ---

  > Hi Helen
  >
  > On 12/4/2024 11:14 AM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote:
  > > Hi Abhinav,
  > >
  > > Thanks for your patch.
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > > ---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:55:17 -0300 Abhinav Kumar  wrote ---
  > >
  > >   > From the jobs [1] and [2] of pipeline [3], its clear that
  > >   > kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo is most certainly a flake and
  > >   > not a fail for apq8016. Mark the test accordingly to match the results.
  > >   >
  > >   > [1] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67676481
  > >   > [2] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67677430
  > >   > [3]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1322770
  > >   >
  > >   > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  > >   > ---
  > >   >  drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt | 5 +++++
  > >   >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
  > >   >
  > >   > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt
  > >   > new file mode 100644
  > >   > index 000000000000..18639853f18f
  > >   > --- /dev/null
  > >   > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt
  > >   > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
  > >   > +# Board Name: msm-apq8016-db410c
  > >   > +# Failure Rate: 100
  > >
  > > Is failure rate is 100%, isn't it a fail than?
  > > (I know we have other cases with Failure Rate: 100, maybe we should fix them as well)
  > >
  >
  > Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of "Failure rate" for a flake.
  >
  > I interpreted this as this test being flaky 100% of the time :)

Ah right, I see, inside deqp-runner (that auto-retries).

I'd like to hear Vignesh's opinion on this.

(In any case, we probably should document this better)

Regards,
Helen


Can you let me know which way we need to go?

Just in case I did post a v2 fixing this, https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/627276/

If thats the way to go, can you pls take a look?

Thanks

Abhinav
  >
  > Out of the 3 runs of the test, it passed 2/3 times and failed 1/3.
  >
  > So its fail % actually is 33.33% in that case.
  >
  > I think I saw a Failure rate of 100% on msm-sm8350-hdk-flakes.txt and
  > mistook that as the rate at which flakes are seen.
  >
  > Let me fix this up as 33%
  >
  > > Regards,
  > > Helen
  > >
  > >   > +# IGT Version: 1.28-ga73311079
  > >   > +# Linux Version: 6.12.0-rc2
  > >   > +kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo
  > >   >
  > >   > ---
  > >   > base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b
  > >   > change-id: 20241204-cursor_tor_skip-9d128dd62c4f
  > >   >
  > >   > Best regards,
  > >   > --
  > >   > Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  > >   >
  > >   >
  > >
  >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux