Hi Abhinav, Thanks for your patch. ---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:55:17 -0300 Abhinav Kumar wrote --- > From the jobs [1] and [2] of pipeline [3], its clear that > kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo is most certainly a flake and > not a fail for apq8016. Mark the test accordingly to match the results. > > [1] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67676481 > [2] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67677430 > [3]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1322770 > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..18639853f18f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +# Board Name: msm-apq8016-db410c > +# Failure Rate: 100 Is failure rate is 100%, isn't it a fail than? (I know we have other cases with Failure Rate: 100, maybe we should fix them as well) Regards, Helen > +# IGT Version: 1.28-ga73311079 > +# Linux Version: 6.12.0-rc2 > +kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo > > --- > base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b > change-id: 20241204-cursor_tor_skip-9d128dd62c4f > > Best regards, > -- > Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >
