On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 04:40:51PM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: > > On 11/20/2024 4:09 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 13:05, Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 11/14/2024 4:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 09:06:55AM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 11/13/2024 8:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:44AM +0000, Renjiang Han (QUIC) wrote: > >>>>>>> Hello > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The following changes since commit 6482750d396980a31f76edd5a84b03a96bbdf3fe: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Merge branch 'verb' into 'main' (2024-11-11 20:01:00 +0000) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> are available in the Git repository at: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:clo/linux-kernel/linux-firmware.git<mailto:git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:clo/linux-kernel/linux-firmware.git> video-firmware-qcs615 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 1e7f65883150d3b48307b4f0d6871c60151ee25b: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> qcom: venus-5.4: add venus firmware file for qcs615 (2024-11-13 15:50:29 +0530) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> Renjiang Han (1): > >>>>>>> qcom: venus-5.4: add venus firmware file for qcs615 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> WHENCE | 1 + > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Could you please be more specific, what is the difference between the > >>>>>> existing file and a new file? According to the soc_vers the new file > >>>>>> supports sdm845. Should it instead replace the old firmware? > >>>>> SDM845, SC7180, qcs615 can be enabled on same firmware ideally, but due to a > >>>>> different signing for qcs615, it takes a separate bin (xxx_s6.mbn). > >>>> > >>>> Can SDM845 handle v6 signatures? It supports v5 and PSS. Or can QCS615 > >>>> use v5 signatures? > >>> Infact we started with loading sc7180 firmware on qc615, video init failed. So > >>> far i have seen 2 categories in signing version for video bins, either default > >>> or v6 specific tool. > >> > >> Can firmware / security engineers actually advice us on using v5 > >> firmware signatures with QCS615 _and_ with older platforms? > >> Existing venus-5.4/venus.mbn uses v3 > > > > Vikash, any updates on this topic? Would it be possible to have a single > > FW image with just v5 signatures? > Not yet Dmitry. Having a followup with relevant folks this friday to understand > the signing requirements across different SOCs, hopefully will be able to add > something on this by then. Ack, thank you. -- With best wishes Dmitry
