On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 01:31:14PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 at 13:05, Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On 11/14/2024 4:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 09:06:55AM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: > > >> > > >> On 11/13/2024 8:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > >>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:50:44AM +0000, Renjiang Han (QUIC) wrote: > > >>>> Hello > > >>>> > > >>>> The following changes since commit 6482750d396980a31f76edd5a84b03a96bbdf3fe: > > >>>> > > >>>> Merge branch 'verb' into 'main' (2024-11-11 20:01:00 +0000) > > >>>> > > >>>> are available in the Git repository at: > > >>>> > > >>>> git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:clo/linux-kernel/linux-firmware.git<mailto:git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:clo/linux-kernel/linux-firmware.git> video-firmware-qcs615 > > >>>> > > >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 1e7f65883150d3b48307b4f0d6871c60151ee25b: > > >>>> > > >>>> qcom: venus-5.4: add venus firmware file for qcs615 (2024-11-13 15:50:29 +0530) > > >>>> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>> Renjiang Han (1): > > >>>> qcom: venus-5.4: add venus firmware file for qcs615 > > >>>> > > >>>> WHENCE | 1 + > > >>> > > >>> Could you please be more specific, what is the difference between the > > >>> existing file and a new file? According to the soc_vers the new file > > >>> supports sdm845. Should it instead replace the old firmware? > > >> SDM845, SC7180, qcs615 can be enabled on same firmware ideally, but due to a > > >> different signing for qcs615, it takes a separate bin (xxx_s6.mbn). > > > > > > Can SDM845 handle v6 signatures? It supports v5 and PSS. Or can QCS615 > > > use v5 signatures? > > Infact we started with loading sc7180 firmware on qc615, video init failed. So > > far i have seen 2 categories in signing version for video bins, either default > > or v6 specific tool. > > Can firmware / security engineers actually advice us on using v5 > firmware signatures with QCS615 _and_ with older platforms? > Existing venus-5.4/venus.mbn uses v3 Vikash, any updates on this topic? Would it be possible to have a single FW image with just v5 signatures? -- With best wishes Dmitry
