Re: add venus firmware file for qcs615

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 17:00, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 9:43 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 07:22:28AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 5:50 AM Renjiang Han (QUIC)
> > > <quic_renjiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit 6482750d396980a31f76edd5a84b03a96bbdf3fe:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   Merge branch 'verb' into 'main' (2024-11-11 20:01:00 +0000)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:clo/linux-kernel/linux-firmware.git video-firmware-qcs615
> > >
> > > Merged and pushed out.
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.com/kernel-firmware/linux-firmware/-/merge_requests/370
> >
> > Josh, it is very nice to see a promt merging of the firmware, thanks a
> > lot. However is there a chance that you can give reviewers a time to
> > react? Usually there are no issues, but I think it is important to let
> > the comminity to be able to review the patch / pull request.
>
> Happy to let things sit for a while.  Out of curiosity, what exactly
> are you reviewing?  They're binary blobs.

Yes. However sometimes they can be pushed to a disputable location or
have other issues. In this case I'd like to understand whether this
binary is specific to QCS615 (and thus it should be a separate binary)
or it's just a somehow updated version of the existing binary.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux