On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 07:36:16PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > On 10/25/24 19:23, Johan Hovold wrote: > > Also seems to do the trick: > > > > Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > But perhaps you could consider starting enumerating the duplicate > > domains from 2 (or 1) instead of 0?: > > > > NCC_1 on 0 > > NCC_0 on 0 > > NCC on 0 > > We are just trying to make sure node names are unique and > can't ensure the pd-name correctness since ida starts its > number generation from 0 and I didn't want to shape the > fix just to cater to our specific case. The firmware fix > will be in charge of ensuring pd-name correctness. Ah, it's a global number space? I didn't really look at the implementation... Johan
