On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:28 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 09:15:06PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:23 AM Krishna chaitanya chundru
> > <quic_krichai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently the pwrctl driver is child of pci-pci bridge driver,
> > > this will cause issue when suspend resume is introduced in the pwr
> > > control driver. If the supply is removed to the endpoint in the
> > > power control driver then the config space access by the
> > > pci-pci bridge driver can cause issues like Timeouts.
> > >
> > > For this reason change the parent to controller from pci-pci bridge.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4565d2652a37 ("PCI/pwrctl: Add PCI power control core code")
> > > Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Bjorn,
> >
> > I think this should go into v6.11 as it does indeed better represent
> > the underlying logic.
>
> Is this patch independent of the rest? I don't think the whole series
> looks like v6.11 material, but if this patch can be applied
> independently, *and* we can make a case in the commit log for why it
> is v6.11 material, we can do that.
>
> Right now the commit log doesn't tell me enough to justify a
> post-merge window change.
>
> Bjorn
Please, apply this patch independently. FYI I have a WiP branch[1]
with a v3 of the fixes series rebased on top of this one. Manivannan
and I are working on fixing one last remaining issue and I'll resend
it. This should go into v6.11.
Bart
[1] https://git.codelinaro.org/bartosz_golaszewski/linux/-/tree/topic/pci-pwrctl-fixes
