> > > > So I must admit I can't be bothered as well with that honestly. > > Okay, I guess the conclusion is that if the firmware vendors don't care > enough to provide unique names, they get to live without those > debugfs nodes. > > Do we really want to register/expose scmi perf power-domains used by > the CPU nodes? How about not register debugfs for perf? Given that scmi-cpufreq doesn't consume these power > domains and can be voted upon by another consumer, wouldn't this > cause a disconnect? You might be also interested in [1], which is also scmi cpufreq related. [1]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729070325.2065286-1-peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx/ Regards, Peng. > > -Sibi > > > -- > > Regards, > > Sudeep
