A few small issues discovered while (thus far unsuccessfully) trying to bring up a 64MP sensor. The chosen frame limitation of 8192 seems to be somewhat arbitrary as there don't appear to be any hardware limits on maximum frame size. Double the maximum allowable frame size to accommodate bigger sensors. Next the larger data sizes end up needing bigger pixel clocks. This exposed a bug for 8250 devices where the VFE clocks are shared between two blocks, but the CSID block is being initialized second and overwriting the carefully selected clock rates from VFE. This was likely not a problem earlier because the lowest VFE clock rate that CSID was selecting was good enough for the family of sensors that were being used. Jordan Crouse (2): media: camss: Increase the maximum frame size media: camss: Avoid overwriting vfe clock rates for 8250 .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csid.c | 8 +++---- .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c | 4 ++-- .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-ispif.c | 4 ++-- drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 4 ++-- .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-video.c | 6 +++--- drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 21 +++++++++++++------ 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) -- 2.40.1
