On 6/4/24 14:20, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 02:00:10PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 6/3/24 14:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
As I just mentioned in my reply on the PHY patch, this does not seem to
work on the CRD were the link still come up as 2-lane (also with the
clocks fixed):
qcom-pcie 1bf8000.pci: PCIe Gen.4 x2 link up
So something appears to be wrong here or in the PHY changes.
Is the device on the other end x4-capable? Or does it not matter in
this log line?
Yes, of course. It's the CRD as I wrote above, and you can tell from
other log entries:
pci 0007:01:00.0: 31.506 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0007:00:00.0 (capable of 63.012 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x4 link)
lspci and what Windows reports.
Ok, good. I was scared of double-sourcing of parts that are not identical
in spec..
[1] suggests this wasn't ever achieved.. which makes the cover letter of
this series a bit misleading..
What does the TCSR check return? If 0, can you hardcode it to 1 and see if
the link comes up at x4?
Konrad
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zl8H0KOrfuF91kpZ@xxxxxxxxxx/
