On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 01:37:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/06/2024 13:17, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 03/06/2024 14:43, Johan Hovold wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 07:06:44PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote: > >>>> The PCIe 6th instance from X1E80100 can be used in both 4-lane mode or > >>> > >>> nit: s/PCIe 6th/sixth PCIe/ > >>> nit: s/from/on/ > >>> nit: s/both/either/ > >> > >> That's really nit-picking and not helpful in getting things merged. > > > > Writing proper commit messages with correct grammar is in no way to be > > asking too much (especially from experienced kernel devs). > > Well, many of us are not native English speakers, so when the commit msg > is 100% understandable, pointing out grammar mistakes or style > (6th->sixth) issues is nit-picking and is asking for unnecessary work. Well I did use a "nit:" prefix for a reason. And I hope people are still interested in improving their English even if it's not their first language. Johan
