On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 10:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 28/05/2024 22:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Force GCC device nodes to have the name 'clock-controller'. Several > > platforms used 'gcc' here. > > Well, only ones coming from Qualcomm being downstream-based: > > Author: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Jun 29 11:48:33 2017 +0530 > > Author: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun Jan 19 18:43:20 2020 +0530 > > (and there was also older with node name qcom,gcc, so clearly copy-paste > from downstream sources) > > yet still we do not enforce names in individual schemas. You add it now > and next month turns out there is a power-reset-clock-controller which > could use gcc.yaml, but cannot because of node name enforcement. Ok, please ignore this patch, I'll drop it from the next iteration -- With best wishes Dmitry
