Re: [PATCH 05/10] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,gcc-nopd.yaml: force node name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/05/2024 22:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Force GCC device nodes to have the name 'clock-controller'. Several
> platforms used 'gcc' here.

Well, only ones coming from Qualcomm being downstream-based:

Author: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Jun 29 11:48:33 2017 +0530

Author: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sun Jan 19 18:43:20 2020 +0530

(and there was also older with node name qcom,gcc, so clearly copy-paste
from downstream sources)

yet still we do not enforce names in individual schemas. You add it now
and next month turns out there is a power-reset-clock-controller which
could use gcc.yaml, but cannot because of node name enforcement.


Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux