On 5/7/24 22:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2024-05-07 06:51:04)
without PARENT_OPS_ENABLE:
[ 3.326891] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: Got CD GPIO
[ 3.336839] scsi host0: ufshcd
[ 3.337105] gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src is DISABLED @ set_rate
[ 3.346339] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3.351093] gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src: rcg didn't update its configuration.
[ 3.351114] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 11 at drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:133 update_config+0xc8/0xd8
[...]
[ 3.610523] gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src is ENABLED @ set_rate
with PARENT_OPS_ENABLE:
[ 3.331419] sdhci_msm 8804000.mmc: Got CD GPIO
[ 3.336569] gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src is DISABLED @ set_rate
[ 3.344795] scsi host0: ufshcd
[ 3.355122] qcrypto 1dfa000.crypto: Adding to iommu group 5
[ 3.363567] remoteproc remoteproc0: 2400000.remoteproc is available
[ 3.364729] gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src is ENABLED @ set_rate
after testing it both ways, I realized it wasn't supposed to make a
difference in this regard, but I suppose I can paste both results anyway..
Can you share your patch that prints the message? What bit are you
checking in the hardware to determine if the RCG is enabled? Do you also
print the enable count in software?
I already reset-ed the tree state, but I added something like
if (rcg->cmd_rcgr == the one in the declaration)
pr_err("gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src is %s\n", clk_is_enabled(hw) ? "ENABLED" : "DISABLED");
to drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c : __clk_rcg2_set_rate()
Konrad
