On Fri, Feb 26 2016 at 11:17 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 02/12, Lina Iyer wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/power/devices.txt b/Documentation/power/devices.txt
index 8ba6625..c06f0b6 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/devices.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/devices.txt
@@ -607,7 +607,16 @@ individually. Instead, a set of devices sharing a power resource can be put
into a low-power state together at the same time by turning off the shared
power resource. Of course, they also need to be put into the full-power state
together, by turning the shared power resource on. A set of devices with this
-property is often referred to as a power domain.
+property is often referred to as a power domain. A power domain may also be
+nested inside another power domain.
+
+Devices, by default, operate in process context and if a device can operate in
+IRQ safe context, has to be explicitly set as IRQ safe. Power domains by
Devices, by default, operate in process context. If a device can
operate in IRQ safe context that has to be explicitly indicated
by setting the irq_safe boolean inside struct generic_pm_domain
to true. Power domains typically operate in process context...
Done.
+default, operate in process context but could have devices that are IRQ safe.
+Such power domains cannot be powered on/off during runtime PM. On the other
+hand, an IRQ safe PM domains that have IRQ safe devices may be powered off
On the other hand, IRQ safe PM domains that have ..
Done.
+when all the devices are in idle. An IRQ safe domain may only be attached as a
all the devices in the domain?
Devices need not be IRQ safe.
<...>
+static struct genpd_lock_fns no_sleep_lock = {
const?
OK
...
+ /*
+ * As we dont power off a non IRQ safe domain, which holds
s/dont/don't/
+ * an IRQ safe device, we dont need to restore power to it.
s/dont/don't/
Done to both.
+ */
+ if (dev->power.irq_safe && !genpd->irq_safe) {
timed = false;
goto out;
}
@@ -1296,6 +1359,13 @@ int __pm_genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(genpd) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (genpd->irq_safe && !dev->power.irq_safe) {
+ dev_err(dev,
+ "PM Domain %s is IRQ safe; device has to IRQ safe.\n",
has to be?
This is a remenant. This limitation need not exist. Removed.
+ genpd->name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
gpd_data = genpd_alloc_dev_data(dev, genpd, td);
if (IS_ERR(gpd_data))
return PTR_ERR(gpd_data);
@@ -1394,6 +1464,17 @@ int pm_genpd_add_subdomain(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
|| genpd == subdomain)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * If the domain can be powered on/off in an IRQ safe
+ * context, ensure that the subdomain can also be
+ * powered on/off in that context.
+ */
+ if (!genpd->irq_safe && subdomain->irq_safe) {
+ WARN("Parent %s of subdomain %s must be IRQ-safe\n",
Nitpick! IRQ-safe or IRQ safe? Use one consistently please.
Sorry. It will be IRQ safe.
Thank,
Lina
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html