On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:30:02PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 13:57, Varadarajan Narayanan > <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Use the icc-clk framework to enable few clocks to be able to > > create paths and use the peripherals connected on those NoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v8: Bind clock and interconnect using master and slave ids > > Use indices instead of clock pointers > > v7: Auto select INTERCONNECT & INTERCONNECT_CLK in COMMON_CLK_QCOM > > to address build break with random config build test, with the > > following combination > > > > CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_QCOM=y > > and > > CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_CLK=m > > > > the following error is seen as devm_icc_clk_register is in a > > module and being referenced from vmlinux. > > > > powerpc64-linux-ld: drivers/clk/qcom/common.o: in function `qcom_cc_really_probe': > > >> common.c:(.text+0x980): undefined reference to `devm_icc_clk_register' > > > > v6: Move enum to dt-bindings and share between here and DT > > first_id -> icc_first_node_id > > v5: Split from common.c changes into separate patch > > No functional changes > > --- > > drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig > > index 8ab08e7b5b6c..b65a373f2e6b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig > > @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ menuconfig COMMON_CLK_QCOM > > select RATIONAL > > select REGMAP_MMIO > > select RESET_CONTROLLER > > + select INTERCONNECT > > + select INTERCONNECT_CLK > > > > if COMMON_CLK_QCOM > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.c > > index 0a3f846695b8..7983e9ba0f35 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.c > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > > */ > > > > #include <linux/clk-provider.h> > > +#include <linux/interconnect-clk.h> > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/of.h> > > @@ -12,6 +13,7 @@ > > > > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h> > > #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h> > > +#include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,ipq9574.h> > > > > #include "clk-alpha-pll.h" > > #include "clk-branch.h" > > @@ -4301,6 +4303,32 @@ static const struct qcom_reset_map gcc_ipq9574_resets[] = { > > [GCC_WCSS_Q6_TBU_BCR] = { 0x12054, 0 }, > > }; > > > > +#define IPQ_APPS_ID 9574 /* some unique value */ > > + > > +static struct qcom_icc_hws_data icc_ipq9574_hws[] = { > > + HWS_DATA(ANOC_PCIE0, GCC_ANOC_PCIE0_1LANE_M_CLK), > > Have you seen other parts of the qcom framework using macros to wrap > around structure initialisation? I don't think so. Please follow the > suit and inline the macro here. Ok, will change and post a new version. Thanks Varada > > + HWS_DATA(SNOC_PCIE0, GCC_SNOC_PCIE0_1LANE_S_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(ANOC_PCIE1, GCC_ANOC_PCIE1_1LANE_M_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(SNOC_PCIE1, GCC_SNOC_PCIE1_1LANE_S_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(ANOC_PCIE2, GCC_ANOC_PCIE2_2LANE_M_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(SNOC_PCIE2, GCC_SNOC_PCIE2_2LANE_S_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(ANOC_PCIE3, GCC_ANOC_PCIE3_2LANE_M_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(SNOC_PCIE3, GCC_SNOC_PCIE3_2LANE_S_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(USB, GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(USB_AXI, GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_NSSCC, GCC_NSSNOC_NSSCC_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_SNOC_0, GCC_NSSNOC_SNOC_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_SNOC_1, GCC_NSSNOC_SNOC_1_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_PCNOC_1, GCC_NSSNOC_PCNOC_1_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_QOSGEN_REF, GCC_NSSNOC_QOSGEN_REF_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_TIMEOUT_REF, GCC_NSSNOC_TIMEOUT_REF_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_XO_DCD, GCC_NSSNOC_XO_DCD_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_ATB, GCC_NSSNOC_ATB_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(MEM_NOC_NSSNOC, GCC_MEM_NOC_NSSNOC_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_MEMNOC, GCC_NSSNOC_MEMNOC_CLK), > > + HWS_DATA(NSSNOC_MEM_NOC_1, GCC_NSSNOC_MEM_NOC_1_CLK), > > +}; > > + > > static const struct of_device_id gcc_ipq9574_match_table[] = { > > { .compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-gcc" }, > > { } > > @@ -4323,6 +4351,9 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_ipq9574_desc = { > > .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_ipq9574_resets), > > .clk_hws = gcc_ipq9574_hws, > > .num_clk_hws = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_ipq9574_hws), > > + .icc_hws = icc_ipq9574_hws, > > + .num_icc_hws = ARRAY_SIZE(icc_ipq9574_hws), > > + .icc_first_node_id = IPQ_APPS_ID, > > }; > > > > static int gcc_ipq9574_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry