On Wednesday 24 February 2016 11:39:26 Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 08 February 2016 05:30 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > In a recent patch series that aimed to remove code related to module > > unload for PCI support that was simply non modular, the discussion > > led to people wanting to keep the code and push towards taking the > > steps needed to support moving it towards tristate instead[1]. > > > > Here, we take step one, which is simply making the Kconfig change > > and then dealing with any build fallout or modpost fallout. What > > amounts to essentially a sanity build test. To be clear, these > > have not been runtime validated; that will need to be done by those > > with access to real hardware. However, the changes are not anything > > that should disrupt any existing built-in validation, so real world > > users should not be impacted by this change. > > > > We start with a smaller family of drivers; those that actively select > > PCI_DW, as a nice self contained group to test the waters and see if > > everyone is still good with this approach before investing more time > > on a wider scale to other pci/host/ code blocks. > > > > As such the drivers here share a dependency on having the same group > > of functions exported in order to successfully complete modpost. > > > > In addition, we have to stray outside drivers/pci to add exports > > in two places; once for an ARM fault handler, and once for an OF > > variable. > > > > The pci-keystone-dw.c instance was handled separately because it > > consists of two source files that need their own group of driver > > specific exports above and beyond the "shared" ones. > > > > Then we convert the Kconfig for all remaining at once; we could have > > done it on a per driver basis for ease of revert if anyone really > > objects, but since it would be a one line change, that seemed like > > not a real concern. > > > > Build testing was done on the linux-next tree for arm allmodconfig. > > I took these patches and gave a test with DRA7xx board. As expected there was > no issues when the driver was built-in. However when I tried to rmmod/modprobe > I got this error [2]. Thanks for testing this! > [2] -> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15185894/ It looks like you are hitting the BUG_ON() in ioremap_pte_range() that checks if a virtual address already has a page table entry, which in turn is probably a result of dw_pcie_host_init() calling pci_remap_iospace() again for the same memory area it has called the last time, and no cleanup done inbetween. Could you try adding a pci_unmap_iospace() and calling that in the device remove function? Let me know if you need help implementing it. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
