On Montag, 8. April 2024 19:26:49 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > On 4/8/24 18:39, Luca Weiss wrote: > > Allow specifying a GPIO hog, as already used on > > qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml > > index a786357ed1af..510a05369dbb 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml > > @@ -424,6 +424,10 @@ patternProperties: > > $ref: "#/$defs/qcom-pmic-gpio-state" > > additionalProperties: false > > > > + "^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$": > > I see a couple bindings do this, but I'm not sure if we want two > allow two styles for no reason.. Rob? This regex is actually from the gpio-hog.yaml base https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/gpio/gpio-hog.yaml#L23 Why it's made this way I cannot tell you, but I didn't want to 'artifically' restrict the pattern for qcom,pmic-gpio. > > Konrad >
