On 4/5/2024 11:19 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 21:17, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/5/2024 11:16 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 20:20, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/9/2024 7:09 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
All the bridges that are being used with the MSM DSI hosts have been
converted to support DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR. Drop the fallback
code and require DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR to be supported by the
downstream bridges.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c | 36 +++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
There are the bridges I checked by looking at the dts:
1) lontium,lt9611
2) lontium,lt9611uxc
3) adi,adv7533
4) ti,sn65dsi86
Are there any more?
If not, this LGTM
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From your message it looks more like Tested-by rather than just Reviewed-by
No, I only cross-checked the dts.
So, its only Reviewed-by :)
But I wanted to list down all the bridges
Then I'd also nominate the panel bridge to the list of bridges for
cross-checking. It is created automatically when we request a bridge,
but DT has only a panel.
Yes, that one is fine too
58 static int panel_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
59 enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
60 {
61 struct panel_bridge *panel_bridge = drm_bridge_to_panel_bridge(bridge);
62 struct drm_connector *connector = &panel_bridge->connector;
63 int ret;
64
65 if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)
66 return 0;
67
