On 02/12, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 09:30:17AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > This reverts commit 18560a4e3b07438113b50589e78532d95f907029. > > > > The commit that caused us to specify LE device endianness here, > > 29bb45f25ff3 (regmap-mmio: Use native endianness for read/write, > > 2015-10-29), has been reverted in mainline so now when we specify > > So, I applied this to -next as that's where it applies but it seems that > you're trying to revert a commit that's in Linus' tree so should go as a > fix to him. Can you send a fix against Linus' tree too please? Did you want me to send the fix directly to Linus? The patch applies to both -next and Linus' tree, although you're right I generated this patch against -next. If I apply it to Linus' tree and then git format-patch it's exactly the same except for the commit hash: $ diff linus next 1c1 < From 4f7c654bfcd159b3068b01e3b522e8af88069cb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 --- > From 798212b523668d5a37a977c660554827aa0d89ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
