On 12/15, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7b0e85eefe70
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
> +
> +static int clk_rpm_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_rpm *r = to_clk_rpm(hw);
> + unsigned long rate = r->rate;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rpm_clk_lock);
> +
> + if (!rate)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (r->branch)
> + rate = !!rate;
> +
> + ret = clk_rpm_set_rate_active(r, rate);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> +out:
> + if (!ret)
> + r->enabled = true;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&rpm_clk_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
I don't see any "peer" code in this file. Is there a reason we're
leaving out the active only vs active + sleep set style clocks?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
