On 21/03/2024 10:56, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:25:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 21/03/2024 05:31, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: >>> Unlike MSM platforms that manage NoC related clocks and scaling >>> from RPM, IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related >>> clocks and there is no NoC scaling. >> >> If these are clocks, expose them as clocks, not as interconnects. > > Earlier IPQ9574 PCIe patches were NAK-ed when these were exposed > as clocks. Please refer to the following discussions > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CAA8EJpq0uawrOBHA8XHygEpGYF--HyxJWxKG44iiFdAZZz7O2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/CAA8EJppabK8j9T40waMv=t-1aksXfqJibWuS41GhruzLhpatrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Dmitry had said > <quote> > I'd kindly suggest implementing the NoC attachment > properly. In the end, other Qualcomm platforms use ICC > drivers, so by following this pattern we will have more > common code paths. > </quote> > > Hence posted these patches to get feedback. Then explain the rationale in commit msg. Best regards, Krzysztof
