On 14/03/2024 10:13, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>
> On 3/13/2024 10:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/03/2024 12:08, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>>> Update the videocc device tree bindings for sm8150 to align with the
>>> latest convention.
>> Everything is an update. Please explain what you did and why. The "why"
>> part you tried to cover but I just don't understand what is "align with
>> the latest convention". What convention?
>
>
> As per the recent upstream discussions, it is recommended to use
> index-based lookup instead of using clock names. The current bindings is
> not aligned with this, hence updating. I'll add the details to commit text.
Yes, please.
>
>
>>> Fixes: 35d26e9292e2 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for the QCOM VIDEOCC clock bindings")
>> What is the bug being fixed here?
>
>
> There are 2 clocks required for this, AHB and XO. Only one clock is
> mentioned in the bindings for SM8150, this is one of the reasons to move
> to latest sm8450 bindings apart from clock names. Hence added a Fixes tag.
This should be in the commit msg.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
