On 3/6/2024 6:23 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > After some thought, I'd suggest to follow approach taken by the rest > of qcom firmware: > put a default (accepted by non-secured hardware) firmware to SoC dir > and then put a vendor-specific firmware into subdir. If any of such > vendors appear, we might even implement structural fallback: first > look into sdm845/Google/blueline, then in sdm845/Google, sdm845/ and > finally just under hw1.0. are there existing examples in linux-firmware? or is the whole point being only the default firmware is in linux-firmware and vendors would follow this pattern if they add their own firmware?
