On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:37:13AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote: > On 3/1/24 10:26 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > There are two cases where this function still returns a pointer. > > Yeah I saw that. I'm in the middle of testing v2 right now. > > I'm very sorry about that. My process includes testing > every patch but somehow I missed these errors on patches 1 > and 2 this time. (The netdev CI doesn't report all the > problems with patch 2; I'm not sure why.) > > Anyway, a new version is coming. Thanks for the note. No problem, stuff happens.
