On 3/1/24 10:26 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
There are two cases where this function still returns a pointer.
Yeah I saw that. I'm in the middle of testing v2 right now. I'm very sorry about that. My process includes testing every patch but somehow I missed these errors on patches 1 and 2 this time. (The netdev CI doesn't report all the problems with patch 2; I'm not sure why.) Anyway, a new version is coming. Thanks for the note. -Alex
