Re: [PATCH 1/9] drm/msm/dp: Add DP support to combo instance in SC7280

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 06:01, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 05:47, Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 01:38:45AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 01:19, Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When upstreamed the SC7280 DP controllers where described as one being
> > > > DP and one eDP, but they can infact both be DP or eDP.
> > > >
> > > > Extend the list of DP controllers to cover both instances, and rely on
> > > > the newly introduced mechanism for selecting which mode they should
> > > > operate in.
> > > >
> > > > Move qcom,sc7280-edp to a dedicated list, to ensure existing DeviceTree
> > > > will continue to select eDP.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 9 +++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > > index 7b8c695d521a..1792ba9f7259 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> > > > @@ -129,7 +129,12 @@ static const struct msm_dp_desc sc7180_dp_descs[] = {
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static const struct msm_dp_desc sc7280_dp_descs[] = {
> > > > -       { .io_start = 0x0ae90000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0, .connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort, .wide_bus_en = true },
> > > > +       { .io_start = 0x0ae90000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0, .wide_bus_en = true },
> > > > +       { .io_start = 0x0aea0000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1, .wide_bus_en = true },
> > >
> > > I think we need to keep .connector_type here, don't we?
> > >
> >
> > No, Abel removes the need for that in his patches - and while that logic
> > is slightly broken in the RFC I think it looks good.
>
> Let's see v2 first.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>



>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > > +       {}
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct msm_dp_desc sc7280_edp_descs[] = {
> > > >         { .io_start = 0x0aea0000, .id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1, .connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP, .wide_bus_en = true },
> > > >         {}
> > > >  };
> > > > @@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ static const struct msm_dp_desc x1e80100_dp_descs[] = {
> > > >  static const struct of_device_id dp_dt_match[] = {
> > > >         { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-dp", .data = &sc7180_dp_descs },
> > > >         { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-dp", .data = &sc7280_dp_descs },
> > > > -       { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp", .data = &sc7280_dp_descs },
> > > > +       { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-edp", .data = &sc7280_edp_descs },
> > > >         { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-dp", .data = &sc8180x_dp_descs },
> > > >         { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-edp", .data = &sc8180x_dp_descs },
> > > >         { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-dp", .data = &sc8280xp_dp_descs },
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best wishes
> > > Dmitry
>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux