Re: [PATCH v5 03/18] dt-bindings: regulator: describe the PMU module of the QCA6390 package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/02/2024 13:53, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 8:32 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/02/2024 19:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 4:48 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:32:00PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> The QCA6390 package contains discreet modules for WLAN and Bluetooth. They
>>>>> are powered by the Power Management Unit (PMU) that takes inputs from the
>>>>> host and provides LDO outputs. This document describes this module.
>>>>
>>>> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
>>>> subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
>>>> Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
>>>> make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
>>>> There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.
>>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> This is quite vague, could you elaborate? I have no idea what is wrong
>>> with this patch.
>>
>> Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
>> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
>> your patch is touching.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> Yes, I always do. And for Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/
> the subjects are split 50:50 between "dt-bindings: regulator: ..." and

No, there are only ~54 "dt + regulator" ones and around 400 starting
with "regulator" (Mark removes first prefix if it is not regulator:). So
50 to 400 is not 50:50.


> "regulator: dt-bindings: ...". For Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> it's overwhelmingly "dt-bindings: <subsystem>: ...". It's the first
> time someone wants me to send a DT bindings patch without
> "dt-bindings" coming first in the subject.
> 
> I mean: I can do it alright but it's not stated anywhere explicitly.

Well, practice was kind of known and obvious, but it is also stated:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst?h=next-20240219#n18



Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux