On Tuesday 12 January 2016 14:18:53 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > On 12/01/16 14:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:52 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > >> To be consistent with other nodes move sdhci node under the soc node, > >> rather than using lable references. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > Maybe remove the label as well if you are no longer using it? > Label "sdhc_1" in this case is used in aliases node. > Ok, nevermind then. > My understanding so far was qcom specific dt want to use hierarchical dt > nodes in the board files, but this brings the question of should we > delete all the unused labels. > > IMO, some unused labels are harmless and would give more consistency to > the reader, removing them might not add great value. Fair enough. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
