On 12/01/16 14:00, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:52 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
To be consistent with other nodes move sdhci node under the soc node,
rather than using lable references.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Maybe remove the label as well if you are no longer using it?
Label "sdhc_1" in this case is used in aliases node.
My understanding so far was qcom specific dt want to use hierarchical dt
nodes in the board files, but this brings the question of should we
delete all the unused labels.
IMO, some unused labels are harmless and would give more consistency to
the reader, removing them might not add great value.
Andy/Stephen, any comments?
--srini
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
