Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: separate CPU OPP tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 06:00, Chukun Pan <amadeus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dmitry
> > Straight to the board files, please, no need for additional includes.
>
> Is it possible to move the mp5496 node to mp5496.dtsi?
> Because ipq9574 also uses this mp5496 pmic.
>
> &rpm_requests {
>         regulators {
>                 compatible = "qcom,rpm-mp5496-regulators";
>
>                 mp5496_s1: s1 {
>                         regulator-min-microvolt = <725000>;
>                         regulator-max-microvolt = <1075000>;
>                         status = "disabled";
>                 };
>
>                 mp5496_s2: s2 {
>                         regulator-min-microvolt = <725000>;
>                         regulator-max-microvolt = <1062500>;
>                         status = "disabled";
>                 };
>
>                 mp5496_l2: l2 {
>                         regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
>                         regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>                         status = "disabled";
>                 };
>         };
> };

Usually this is a bad idea, the regulator boundaries are board specific.

>
> > From your patches I had the feeling that you still want to limit the
> > high-frequency OPP entries if there is no PMIC.
>
> Sorry for this misunderstanding, the cpu max frequency is determined
> by the cpu_speed_bin. It's just that the efuse of the board I have
> without pmic are all 1.2GHz.

Ack, sounds good then.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux