Re: [RFC] arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: model the PMU of the QCA6391

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 23/01/2024 11:04, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:30 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 22/01/2024 19:21, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> I'm limiting the audience of this compared to the PCI power sequencing
>>> series as I wanted to run the DT part by the maintainers before I commit
>>> to a doomed effort.
>>> Here is the DT representation of the QCA6390's PMU with its inputs and
>>> outputs. If I were to implement the pwrseq framework that would be able
>>> to assign the relevant pwrseq data to the consumer based on the actual
>>> regulators and not abstract bt-pwrseq or wlan-pwrseq properties - would
>>> that fly with you?
>>> We'd need to deprecate the existing BT bindings but unfortunately they
>>> are already described as consuming the host PMIC regulators in bindings.
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Please provide lore link to the binding.
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> This is the one:

This does not describe your PMU node. Maybe lack of the binding was
intentional? In such case I missed it from commit msg...

Best regards,

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux