Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Enhance check for VREG in-flight request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/01/2024 08:26, Maulik Shah wrote:
Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte aligned
addresses associated with it. These control voltage, enable state, mode,
and in legacy targets, voltage headroom. The current in-flight request
checking logic looks for exact address matches. Requests for different
addresses of the same RPMh resource as thus not detected as in-flight.

This commit log implies you are fixing a bug.

Can you do some inspection of the git commit log and figure out where to backport this change to ?

Your change would apply to 40482e4f73640d but a quick pass on the logic in check_for_req_inflight() shows its probably _applicable_ to 658628e7ef78e8

  /*
   * Here's a high level overview of how all the registers in RPMH work
   * together:
@@ -557,7 +568,15 @@ static int check_for_req_inflight(struct rsc_drv *drv, struct tcs_group *tcs,
  		for_each_set_bit(j, &curr_enabled, MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS) {
  			addr = read_tcs_cmd(drv, drv->regs[RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR], i, j);
  			for (k = 0; k < msg->num_cmds; k++) {
-				if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)
+				/*
+				 * Each RPMh VREG accelerator resource has 3 or 4 contiguous 4-byte
+				 * aligned addresses associated with it. Ignore the offset to check
+				 * for in-flight VREG requests.
+				 */
+				if (ACCL_TYPE(msg->cmds[k].addr) == HW_ACCL_VREG &&
+				    VREG_ADDR(msg->cmds[k].addr) == VREG_ADDR(addr))
+					return -EBUSY;
+				else if (addr == msg->cmds[k].addr)

Consider removing the /* comment */ if it helps to apply the change earlier than 658628e7ef78e8.

---
bod




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux