On 1/18/2024 11:28 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 1/16/24 16:04, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
Add ACTLR data table for SM8550 along with support for
same including SM8550 specific implementation operations.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]
+static const struct actlr_variant sm8550_actlr[] = {
+ { .io_start = 0x15000000, .actlrcfg = sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg,
+ .num_actlrcfg = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg) },
+ { .io_start = 0x03da0000, .actlrcfg = sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg,
+ .num_actlrcfg = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg) },
+};
Just a nit again, but if struct definitions need to be wrapped, this looks
better:
{
.io_start = 0...,
.aclrcfg = ...,
.num_actlrcfg = ARR..,
}, {
.io_start = 0..,
.aclrcfg = ...,
.num_actlrcfg = ARR..,
};
Noted, will wrap this to keep each member in a new line as shown.
This looks much cleaner. Thanks for this suggestion.
Regards,
Bibek
Konrad
