On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: >>>> Hi Archit, >>>> >>>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3] >>>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127] >>>> >>>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725 >>>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config) >>>> reproduce: >>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>>> make ARCH=x86_64 >>>> >>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >>>> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add': >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) { >>> >>> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI >>> depend on CONFIG_OF? >> >> Please don't. > > Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices > until now was via DT? Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the devices. BR, Jani. > > Archit > >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
