Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Archit,

[auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
[also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
reproduce:
          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
          make ARCH=x86_64

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
       if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {

Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
depend on CONFIG_OF?

Please don't.

Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices
until now was via DT?

Archit


BR,
Jani.


--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux