Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/10/2024 9:36 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:12:18PM +0530, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
  static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
  		struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
  {
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+	struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+	const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
+	int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
  	struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;

  	smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
@@ -248,6 +285,16 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
  	priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
  	priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;

+	if (qsmmu->data->actlrvar) {
+		actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
+		for (; actlrvar->io_start; actlrvar++) {
+			if (actlrvar->io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
+				qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar->actlrcfg);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
  	return 0;
  }

@@ -274,6 +321,21 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
  static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
  		struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
  {
+	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+	struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+	const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
+	int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
+
+	if (qsmmu->data->actlrvar) {
+		actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
+		for (; actlrvar->io_start; actlrvar++) {
+			if (actlrvar->io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
+				qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar->actlrcfg);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+

This block and the one in qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context() are exactly
the same. Possible to do some refactoring?


I will check if this repeated blocks can be accomodated this into qcom_smmu_set_actlr function if that would be fine.

  	smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;

  	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index f3b91963e234..29d26dfa2ed9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
  /*
- * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
   */


It should be 2022-2023 .


Ack

  #ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
@@ -24,8 +24,17 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
  	const u32 *reg_offset;
  };

+struct actlr_config;
+
+struct actlr_variant {
+	const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
+	const resource_size_t io_start;
+};
+
  struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
+	const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
  	const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
+	const int num_smmu;
  	const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
  	const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
  };

qcom_smmu_match_data::num_smmu needs cleanup.


Ack, thanks for pointing this out.

Thanks & regards,
Bibek

Thanks,
Pavan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux