On 1/10/2024 9:36 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 05:12:18PM +0530, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+ const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
+ int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
@@ -248,6 +285,16 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
+ if (qsmmu->data->actlrvar) {
+ actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
+ for (; actlrvar->io_start; actlrvar++) {
+ if (actlrvar->io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
+ qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar->actlrcfg);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -274,6 +321,21 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+ const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
+ int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
+
+ if (qsmmu->data->actlrvar) {
+ actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
+ for (; actlrvar->io_start; actlrvar++) {
+ if (actlrvar->io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
+ qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar->actlrcfg);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
This block and the one in qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context() are exactly
the same. Possible to do some refactoring?
I will check if this repeated blocks can be accomodated this into
qcom_smmu_set_actlr function if that would be fine.
smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index f3b91963e234..29d26dfa2ed9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
/*
- * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
*/
It should be 2022-2023 .
Ack
#ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
@@ -24,8 +24,17 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
const u32 *reg_offset;
};
+struct actlr_config;
+
+struct actlr_variant {
+ const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
+ const resource_size_t io_start;
+};
+
struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
+ const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
+ const int num_smmu;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
};
qcom_smmu_match_data::num_smmu needs cleanup.
Ack, thanks for pointing this out.
Thanks & regards,
Bibek
Thanks,
Pavan