On 24-01-05 14:22:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 13:44, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 5.01.2024 11:16, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > The device match config init table already has zero values, so rework
> > > the container struct to hold a copy of the init table that can be
> > > override be the DT specified values. By doing this, only the number of
> > > vregs remain in the device match config that will be later needed, so
> > > instead of holding the cfg after probe, store the number of vregs in the
> > > container struct.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 99a517a582fc ("phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater: Zero out untouched tuning regs")
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > This looks good as-is, though I think my proposal of storing the
> > peripheral base reg instead is still better, as it'd require less
> > memory (no kmemdup as the regs wouldn't be modified).
>
> I'd second this. We usually handle such cases via the base + offset
> rather than patching the data. If regfields can not handle this, then
> the regfield should be fixed.
>
Sure. Will do that instead.
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
