> 2023年12月12日 下午10:44，Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道： > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 03:47:16PM +0800, 'Guanjun' wrote: >> From: Guanjun <guanjun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Compiler reports the error message when compiling the file drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_pdcharger_ulog.c: >> - ./include/trace/define_trace.h:95:42: fatal error: ./pmic_pdcharger_ulog.h: No such file or directory >> 95 | #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE) >> >> TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH shoule be relative to the path include/trace/define_trace.h, not >> the file including it. Fix it. >> >> Fixes: 086fdb48bc65d(soc: qcom: add ADSP PDCharger ULOG driver) >> Signed-off-by: Guanjun <guanjun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > For what it is worth I sent a similar patch (which handled this by using > the CFLAG -I recommendation) over here about a week ago: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231205-pmicpdcharger-ulog-fixups-v1-1-71c95162cb84@xxxxxxxxxx/ Sorry. I didn’t check you have already sent the fixed patch. Please ignore this email > > I keep disabling this driver locally when developing (or picking up that > patch) until something gets scooped up. > >> --- >> drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_pdcharger_ulog.h | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_pdcharger_ulog.h b/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_pdcharger_ulog.h >> index 9d5d9af4fbe4..3ac994d160bd 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_pdcharger_ulog.h >> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/pmic_pdcharger_ulog.h >> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(pmic_pdcharger_ulog_msg, >> /* This part must be outside protection */ >> >> #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH >> -#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH . >> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH ../../../drivers/soc/qcom/ >> >> #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE >> #define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE pmic_pdcharger_ulog >> -- >> 2.39.3 >> >>
