On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 14:25, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 02:16:27PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 13:47, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 01:10:59PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 13:09, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The first error is sometimes GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS failed (-95) instead: > > > > > > > > Ack, thank you. This is pending on my side together with the UCSI > > > > glink / altmode rework. I hope to have patches for that closer to the > > > > NY. > > > > > > What does that mean? That we shall revert these patches until that work > > > is finished? I don't want to have these errors littering the logs, > > > scaring users and possibly slowing down boot (those are five second > > > timeouts). > > > > Just send a patch disabling ucsi for sc8280xp. > > Ok, will do. > > Looks like that is indeed the only platform besides sc8180x which had > not yet been tested. And it has its own peculiarities which I didn't observe on other platforms. > > > > Also, if this was known issue, why wasn't it mentioned the cover letter > > > or commit messages? > > > > Surely it was not the known issue, otherwise I would not have sent the series. > > Ah, sorry, I misunderstood you then. No problem :-) -- With best wishes Dmitry
