On 15.07.2023 17:25, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 11.07.2023 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the >>>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable. >>>> >>>> Tested on SM6375. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Applied, thanks! >>> >>> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks >>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75 >>> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM >>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d >> >> Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove these patches for now. >> >> I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take a look? > I see no reason why it would break things :/ > > You can see that rpmhpd sync_state has not completed, which means all > PDs should still be pinned at max vote.. > > Can we somehow retest it? > > If it still fails, can you try enabling runtime pm on dispcc and hooking > up vddcx? IIRC this was a fluke with the CI, can we retry? Konrad
