On 11.07.2023 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the >>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable. >>> >>> Tested on SM6375. >>> >>> >> >> Applied, thanks! >> >> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75 >> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d > > Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove these patches for now. > > I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take a look? I see no reason why it would break things :/ You can see that rpmhpd sync_state has not completed, which means all PDs should still be pinned at max vote.. Can we somehow retest it? If it still fails, can you try enabling runtime pm on dispcc and hooking up vddcx? Konrad > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271774 > [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/45271775 >
