On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:38:39AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 03:12:13AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > @@ -1310,10 +1302,6 @@ static int at803x_cable_test_start(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > */
> > phy_write(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_ANENABLE);
> > phy_write(phydev, MII_ADVERTISE, ADVERTISE_CSMA);
> > - if (phydev->phy_id != ATH9331_PHY_ID &&
> > - phydev->phy_id != ATH8032_PHY_ID &&
> > - phydev->phy_id != QCA9561_PHY_ID)
> > - phy_write(phydev, MII_CTRL1000, 0);
> ...
> > +static int at8031_cable_test_start(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > + at803x_cable_test_start(phydev);
> > + phy_write(phydev, MII_CTRL1000, 0);
>
> I don't think this is a safe change - same reasons as given on a
> previous patch. You can't randomly reorder register writes like this.
>
Actually for this the order is keeped. Generic function is called and
for at8031 MII_CTRL1000 is called on top of that.
--
Ansuel
