Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-xiaomi-pipa: Add initial device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/10/2023 21:56, Luka Panio wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 8:46 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> If there are no other copyrights here, why did you use BSD-3 license?
> I am by no means a licensing expert, but as sm8250.dts did use BSD-3
> and other device tree's (for example sm8250-xiaomi-elish-boe.dts) did
> use it, I thought I should do the same. Should I drop it?

Did you base your work on these files? This would explain the license,
but then please include original copyrights.

> 
>>
>> chassis-type
>>
>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
>> `make dtbs_check W=1` (see
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
>> https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
>> for instructions).
>>
> Thanks, will do.
> 
>> 0x34 or 34?
> Yes 0x24, should i tend to use decimal?

Please do not trim the content that much. How can I know to what you
refer here? What was in original code? 0x24?



Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux